[ClusterLabs Developers] License for fence-agents
Andrew Beekhof
andrew at beekhof.net
Tue Jan 5 23:30:21 UTC 2016
> On 6 Jan 2016, at 10:18 AM, <ollie at yahoo.com> <ollie at yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> Hi there,
>
> I am curious to know why GPL was chosen as the license for fence-agents, and other ClusterLabs open-source works. As a follow-up question, was the Apache v3 license considered, and if so why was it not chosen?
I think you’ll find that the apache licenses didn’t exist at the point GPL was chosen
> I am working with another open-source project that would like to use fence-agents but the GPL license does not play well with our Apache v3 license.
I don’t see why, you should be able to call GPL “binaries” without being infected.
> My ideal solution would be to have fence-agents move to Apache v3, but I know that's asking a lot.
I’d be surprised if this happened but don’t have a strong opinion one way or the other.
>
> Thanks!
>
> -Ollie
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Developers mailing list
> Developers at clusterlabs.org
> http://clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/developers
More information about the Developers
mailing list