[ClusterLabs Developers] Resurrecting OCF
kgronlund at suse.com
Thu Aug 18 09:31:39 EDT 2016
Jan Pokorný <jpokorny at redhat.com> writes:
> Thinking about that, ClusterLabs may be considered a brand established
> well enough for "clusterlabs" provider to work better than anything
> general such as previously proposed "core". Also, it's not expected
> there will be more RA-centered projects under this umbrella than
> resource-agents (pacemaker deserves to be a provider on its own),
> so it would be pretty unambiguous pointer.
I like this suggestion as well.
> And for new, not well-tested agents within resource-agents, there could
> also be a provider schema akin to "clusterlabs-staging" introduced.
> 1 CZK
...and this too.
Here is another one: While we are moving agents into a new namespace,
perhaps it is time to clean up some of the legacy agents that are no
longer recommended or of questionable quality? Off the top of my head,
A pet peeve of mine would also be to move heartbeat/IPaddr2 to
clusterlabs/IP, to finally get rid of that weird 2 in the name...
// Kristoffer Grönlund
// kgronlund at suse.com
More information about the Developers