[ClusterLabs Developers] [meta] OK to archive users/developers lists externally?

[Andrew Beekhof]

> On 25 Jun 2015, at 2:42 am, Jan Pokorný <jpokorny at redhat.com> wrote:
> 
> On 15/05/15 23:01 +0200, Jan Pokorný wrote:
>> before proceeding, wanted to ask you, the ML admins and the
>> subscribed, if you have any objections again making the two new lists
>> from $SUBJ indexed/archived by (subset of) following ML sinks:
>> - http://gmane.org/
>> - https://www.mail-archive.com/
>> - https://marc.info/
>> - http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/
> 
> Update on this:
> 
> - for both lists a subscription under Gmane and The Mail Archive
>  (former two sites) was attempted
> 
> - users list seems to be added without a glitch (well, I asked
>  for gmane.comp.clustering.clusterlabs.users identifier, got
>  a one without trailing 's', but maybe it's on purpose);
>  guestimated URLs of this very mail (prone to race conditions):
>  http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.clustering.clusterlabs.user/15
>  https://www.mail-archive.com/users@clusterlabs.org/msg00010.html
> 
> - developers list appears not to be added, but this may just be
>  a question of lazy setup upon first message (could be this one),
>  in which case the URLs would be (again, "developers" got shortened
>  to "devel" per Gmane list of lists):
>  http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.clustering.clusterlabs.devel/1
>  https://www.mail-archive.com/developers@clusterlabs.org/msg00000.html
> 
> - if for some paranoid reasons you don't want your messages to be
>  long-time archived by these two services, teach your MUA to add
>  "X-No-Archive: yes" header when posting an e-mail to the list
> 
> - both services offer import of existing archives, so a reiterated
>  question for the crowd (and moderators in particualr) now is whether
>  it would be OK to do so -- the archives themselves are already
>  publicly available, so it should be just a matter of providing
>  the respective URLs

sure

> 
> -- 
> Jan