<html><header></header><body><div style="font-family: tahoma,arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size: 14px;">Yes, sorry took same bash by mistake...here are the correct logs.</div>
<div style="font-family: tahoma,arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size: 14px;"> </div>
<div style="font-family: tahoma,arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size: 14px;">Yes, xstha1 has delay 10s so that I'm giving him precedence, xstha2 has delay 1s and will be stonished earlier.</div>
<div style="font-family: tahoma,arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size: 14px;">During the short time before xstha2 got powered off, I saw it had time to turn on NFS IP (I saw duplicated IP on xstha1).</div>
<div style="font-family: tahoma,arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size: 14px;">And becase configuration has "order zpool_data_order inf: zpool_data ( xstha1_san0_IP )", that means xstha2 had imported the zpool for a small time before being stonished, and this must never happen.</div>
<div style="font-family: tahoma,arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size: 14px;"> </div>
<div style="font-family: tahoma,arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size: 14px;">What suggests me that resources were started on xstha2 (and duplicated IP is an effect) are these logs portions of xstha2.</div>
<div style="font-family: tahoma,arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size: 14px;">These tells me it could not turn off resources on xstha1 (correct, it couldn't contact xstha1):<br /><br />Dec 16 15:08:56 [667] pengine: warning: custom_action: Action xstha1_san0_IP_stop_0 on xstha1 is unrunnable (offline)<br />Dec 16 15:08:56 [667] pengine: warning: custom_action: Action zpool_data_stop_0 on xstha1 is unrunnable (offline)<br />Dec 16 15:08:56 [667] pengine: warning: custom_action: Action xstha2-stonith_stop_0 on xstha1 is unrunnable (offline)<br />Dec 16 15:08:56 [667] pengine: warning: custom_action: Action xstha2-stonith_stop_0 on xstha1 is unrunnable (offline)</div>
<div style="font-family: tahoma,arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size: 14px;"> </div>
<div style="font-family: tahoma,arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size: 14px;">These tells me xstha2 took control of resources, that were actually running on xstha1:<br /><br />Dec 16 15:08:56 [667] pengine: notice: LogAction: * Move xstha1_san0_IP ( xstha1 -> xstha2 )<br />Dec 16 15:08:56 [667] pengine: info: LogActions: Leave xstha2_san0_IP (Started xstha2)<br />Dec 16 15:08:56 [667] pengine: notice: LogAction: * Move zpool_data ( xstha1 -> xstha2 )<br />Dec 16 15:08:56 [667] pengine: info: LogActions: Leave xstha1-stonith (Started xstha2)<br />Dec 16 15:08:56 [667] pengine: notice: LogAction: * Stop xstha2-stonith ( xstha1 ) due to node availability</div>
<div style="font-family: tahoma,arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size: 14px;"> </div>
<div style="font-family: tahoma,arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size: 14px;">The last stonith request is the last beacuse xstha2 was killed by xsrtha1 before the 10s delay, which is what I wanted.</div>
<div style="font-family: tahoma,arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size: 14px;"> </div>
<div style="font-family: tahoma,arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size: 14px;">Gabriele</div>
<div style="font-family: tahoma,arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size: 14px;"> </div>
<div id="wt-mailcard">
<div> </div>
<div><span style="font-size: 14px; font-family: Helvetica;"><strong>Sonicle S.r.l. </strong>: <a href="http://www.sonicle.com/" target="_new">http://www.sonicle.com</a></span></div>
<div><span style="font-size: 14px; font-family: Helvetica;"><strong>Music: </strong><a href="http://www.gabrielebulfon.com/" target="_new">http://www.gabrielebulfon.com</a></span></div>
<div><span style="font-size: 14px; font-family: Helvetica;"><strong>eXoplanets : </strong><a href="https://gabrielebulfon.bandcamp.com/album/exoplanets">https://gabrielebulfon.bandcamp.com/album/exoplanets</a></span></div>
<div> </div>
</div>
<div style="font-family: tahoma,arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size: 14px;"><tt><br /><br /><br />----------------------------------------------------------------------------------<br /><br />Da: Andrei Borzenkov <arvidjaar@gmail.com><br />A: users@clusterlabs.org <br />Data: 17 dicembre 2020 6.38.33 CET<br />Oggetto: Re: [ClusterLabs] Antw: [EXT] delaying start of a resource<br /><br /></tt></div>
<blockquote style="border-left: #000080 2px solid; margin-left: 5px; padding-left: 5px;"><tt>16.12.2020 17:56, Gabriele Bulfon пишет:<br />> Thanks, here are the logs, there are infos about how it tried to start resources on the nodes.<br /><br />Both logs are from the same node.<br /><br />> Keep in mind the node1 was already running the resources, and I simulated a problem by turning down the ha interface.<br />> <br /><br />There is no attempt to start resources in these logs. Logs end with<br />stonith request. As this node had delay 10s, it probably was<br />successfully eliminated by another node, but there are no logs from<br />another node.<br />_______________________________________________<br />Manage your subscription:<br />https://lists.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/users<br /><br />ClusterLabs home: https://www.clusterlabs.org/<br /><br /><br /></tt></blockquote></body></html>