<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html; charset=windows-1252"
http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
On 07/06/2015 02:50 PM, Dejan Muhamedagic wrote:<br>
<blockquote cite="mid:20150706095045.GA27160@walrus.homenet"
type="cite">
<pre wrap="">Hi,
On Sun, Jul 05, 2015 at 09:13:56PM +0500, Muhammad Sharfuddin wrote:
</pre>
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre wrap="">SLES 11 SP 3 + online updates(pacemaker-1.1.11-0.8.11.70
openais-1.1.4-5.22.1.7)
Its a dual primary drbd cluster, which mounts a file system resource
on both the cluster nodes simultaneously(file system type is ocfs2).
Whenever any of the nodes goes down, the file system(/sharedata)
become inaccessible for exact 35 seconds on the other
(surviving/online) node, and then become available again on the
online node.
Please help me understand why the node which survives or remains
online unable to access the file system resource(/sharedata) for 35
seconds ? and how can I fix the cluster so that file system remains
accessible on the surviving node without any interruption/delay(as
in my case of about 35 seconds)
By inaccessible, I meant to say that running "ls -l /sharedata" and
"df /sharedata" does not return any output and does not return the
prompt back on the online node for exact 35 seconds once the other
node becomes offline.
e.g "node1" got offline somewhere around 01:37:15, and then
/sharedata file system was inaccessible during 01:37:35 and 01:38:18
on the online node i.e "node2".
</pre>
</blockquote>
<pre wrap="">
Before the failing node gets fenced you won't be able to use the
ocfs2 filesystem. In this case, the fencing operation takes 40
seconds:
</pre>
</blockquote>
so its expected. <br>
<blockquote cite="mid:20150706095045.GA27160@walrus.homenet"
type="cite">
<pre wrap="">
</pre>
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre wrap="">[...]
Jul 5 01:37:35 node2 sbd: [6197]: info: Writing reset to node slot node1
Jul 5 01:37:35 node2 sbd: [6197]: info: Messaging delay: 40
Jul 5 01:38:15 node2 sbd: [6197]: info: reset successfully
delivered to node1
Jul 5 01:38:15 node2 sbd: [6196]: info: Message successfully delivered.
[...]
</pre>
</blockquote>
<pre wrap="">
You may want to reduce that sbd timeout.</pre>
</blockquote>
Ok, so reducing the sbd timeout(or msgwait) would provide the
uninterrupted access to the ocfs2 file system on the
surviving/online node ?<br>
or would it just minimize the downtime ?<br>
<blockquote cite="mid:20150706095045.GA27160@walrus.homenet"
type="cite">
<pre wrap="">
Thanks,
Dejan
_______________________________________________
Linux-HA mailing list is closing down.
Please subscribe to <a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:users@clusterlabs.org">users@clusterlabs.org</a> instead.
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/users">http://clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/users</a>
_______________________________________________
<a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:Linux-HA@lists.linux-ha.org">Linux-HA@lists.linux-ha.org</a>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha">http://lists.linux-ha.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-ha</a>
</pre>
</blockquote>
--<br>
<div class="moz-signature"><font size="1">Regards,<br>
<br>
</font>
<font size="2">Muhammad Sharfuddin<br>
</font></div>
</body>
</html>