[Pacemaker] CoroSync's UDPu transport for public IP addresses?

Dmitry Koterov dmitry.koterov at gmail.com
Wed Dec 31 18:06:36 EST 2014


No, I meant that if you pass a domain name in ring0_addr, there are no
errors in logs, corosync even seems to find nodes (based on its logs), And
crm_node -l shows them, but in practice nothing really works. A verbose
error message would be very helpful in such case.

On Tuesday, December 30, 2014, Daniel Dehennin <daniel.dehennin at baby-gnu.org>
wrote:

> Dmitry Koterov <dmitry.koterov at gmail.com <javascript:;>> writes:
>
> > Oh, seems I've found the solution! At least two mistakes was in my
> > corosync.conf (BTW logs did not say about any errors, so my conclusion is
> > based on my experiments only).
> >
> > 1. nodelist.node MUST contain only IP addresses. No hostnames! They
> simply
> > do not work, "crm status" shows no nodes. And no warnings are in logs
> > regarding this.
>
> You can add name like this:
>
>     nodelist {
>       node {
>         ring0_addr: <public-ip-address-of-the-first-machine>
>         name: node1
>       }
>       node {
>         ring0_addr: <public-ip-address-of-the-second-machine>
>         name: node2
>       }
>     }
>
> I used it on Ubuntu Trusty with udpu.
>
> Regards.
>
> --
> Daniel Dehennin
> Récupérer ma clef GPG: gpg --recv-keys 0xCC1E9E5B7A6FE2DF
> Fingerprint: 3E69 014E 5C23 50E8 9ED6  2AAD CC1E 9E5B 7A6F E2DF
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://oss.clusterlabs.org/pipermail/pacemaker/attachments/20150101/4ccc7f65/attachment.html>


More information about the Pacemaker mailing list