[Pacemaker] How to find out why pacemaker skipped action?

Andrew Beekhof andrew at beekhof.net
Mon Oct 27 05:40:31 EDT 2014


> On 27 Oct 2014, at 7:36 pm, Andrei Borzenkov <arvidjaar at gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> On Wed, Oct 22, 2014 at 8:59 AM, Andrew Beekhof <andrew at beekhof.net> wrote:
>> 
>>> On 22 Oct 2014, at 4:34 pm, Andrei Borzenkov <arvidjaar at gmail.com> wrote:
>>> 
>>> On Wed, Oct 22, 2014 at 8:01 AM, Andrew Beekhof <andrew at beekhof.net> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>>> On 21 Oct 2014, at 11:15 pm, Andrei Borzenkov <arvidjaar at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>> Pacemaker 1.1.11. I see in engine logs that it is going to restart resource:
>>>>> 
>>>>> Oct 21 12:34:50 n2 pengine[19748]:   notice: LogActions: Restart
>>>>> rsc_SAPHana_HDB_HDB00:0 (Master n2)
>>>>> 
>>>>> But I never see actual stop/start action being executed and in summary I get
>>>>> 
>>>>> Oct 21 12:35:11 n2 crmd[19749]:   notice: run_graph: Transition 32
>>>>> (Complete=10, Pending=0, Fired=0, Skipped=13, Incomplete=3,
>>>>> Source=/var/lib/pacemaker/pengine/pe-input-31.bz2): Stopped
>>>>> 
>>>>> So 13 actions were skipped and I presume restart was among them.
>>>>> 
>>>>> In which logs can I find explanation why actions were skipped? I do
>>>>> not see anything obvious.
>>>> 
>>>> Do you see any actions failing?
>>> 
>>> Yes
>>> 
>>> Oct 21 12:35:10 n2 crmd[19749]:  warning: status_from_rc: Action 11
>>> (rsc_SAPHanaTopology_HDB_HDB00:1_monitor_0) on n1 failed (target: 7
>>> vs. rc: 0): Error
>>> Oct 21 12:35:10 n2 crmd[19749]:  warning: status_from_rc: Action 11
>>> (rsc_SAPHanaTopology_HDB_HDB00:1_monitor_0) on n1 failed (target: 7
>>> vs. rc: 0): Error
>>> 
>>> Now there is the following ordering:
>>> 
>>> order ord_SAPHana_HDB_HDB00 2000: cln_SAPHanaTopology_HDB_HDB00
>>> msl_SAPHana_HDB_HDB00
>>> 
>>>> Further up the crmd should have said why the transaction is being aborted
>>>> 
>>> 
>>> If it says it, I do not yet understand it.
>>> 
>>> Am I right that if any action during transaction returns unexpected
>>> result, transaction is aborted?
>> 
>> Yes, and a new one calculated
> 
> Do CIB updates also abort running transaction?

Unexpected ones do, yes.

> It looks like it, but
> I'd like to be sure.
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Pacemaker mailing list: Pacemaker at oss.clusterlabs.org
> http://oss.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/pacemaker
> 
> Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org
> Getting started: http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf
> Bugs: http://bugs.clusterlabs.org





More information about the Pacemaker mailing list