[Pacemaker] A resource starts with a standby node.(Latest attrd does not serve as the crmd-transition-delay parameter)

[renayama19661014 at ybb.ne.jp]

Hi Andrew,

> >> Are you using the new attrd code or the legacy stuff?
> > 
> > I use new attrd.
> 
> And the values are not being sent to the cib at the same time? 

As far as I looked. . .
When the transmission of the attribute of attrd of the node was late, a leader of attrd seemed to send an attribute to cib without waiting for it.

> >> Only the new code makes (or at least should do) crmd-transition-delay redundant.
> > 
> > It did not seem to work so that new attrd dispensed with crmd-transition-delay to me.
> > I report the details again.
> > # Probably it will be Bugzilla. . .
> 
> Sounds good

All right!

Many Thanks!
Hideo Yamauch.

--- On Tue, 2014/1/14, Andrew Beekhof <andrew at beekhof.net> wrote:

> 
> On 14 Jan 2014, at 4:13 pm, renayama19661014 at ybb.ne.jp wrote:
> 
> > Hi Andrew,
> > 
> > Thank you for comments.
> > 
> >> Are you using the new attrd code or the legacy stuff?
> > 
> > I use new attrd.
> 
> And the values are not being sent to the cib at the same time? 
> 
> > 
> >> 
> >> If you're not using corosync 2.x or see:
> >> 
> >>     crm_notice("Starting mainloop...");
> >> 
> >> then its the old code.  The new code could also be used with CMAN but isn't configured to build for in that situation.
> >> 
> >> Only the new code makes (or at least should do) crmd-transition-delay redundant.
> > 
> > It did not seem to work so that new attrd dispensed with crmd-transition-delay to me.
> > I report the details again.
> > # Probably it will be Bugzilla. . .
> 
> Sounds good
> 
> > 
> > Best Regards,
> > Hideo Yamauchi.
> > 
> > --- On Tue, 2014/1/14, Andrew Beekhof <andrew at beekhof.net> wrote:
> > 
> >> 
> >> On 14 Jan 2014, at 3:52 pm, renayama19661014 at ybb.ne.jp wrote:
> >> 
> >>> Hi All,
> >>> 
> >>> I contributed next bugzilla by a problem to occur for the difference of the timing of the attribute update by attrd before.
> >>> * https://developerbugs.linuxfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2528
> >>> 
> >>> We can evade this problem now by using crmd-transition-delay parameter.
> >>> 
> >>> I confirmed whether I could evade this problem by renewed attrd recently.
> >>> * In latest attrd, one became a leader and seemed to come to update an attribute.
> >>> 
> >>> However, latest attrd does not seem to substitute for crmd-transition-delay.
> >>> * I contribute detailed log later.
> >>> 
> >>> We are dissatisfied with continuing using crmd-transition-delay.
> >>> Is there the plan when attrd handles this problem well in the future?
> >> 
> >> Are you using the new attrd code or the legacy stuff?
> >> 
> >> If you're not using corosync 2.x or see:
> >> 
> >>     crm_notice("Starting mainloop...");
> >> 
> >> then its the old code.  The new code could also be used with CMAN but isn't configured to build for in that situation.
> >> 
> >> Only the new code makes (or at least should do) crmd-transition-delay redundant.
> >> 
> 
>