[Pacemaker] different behavior cibadmin -Ql with cman and corosync2
Christine Caulfield
ccaulfie at redhat.com
Thu Sep 5 04:37:02 EDT 2013
On 03/09/13 22:03, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
>
> On 03/09/2013, at 11:49 PM, Christine Caulfield <ccaulfie at redhat.com> wrote:
>
>> On 03/09/13 05:20, Andrew Beekhof wrote:
>>>
>>> On 02/09/2013, at 5:27 PM, Andrey Groshev <greenx at yandex.ru> wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> 30.08.2013, 07:18, "Andrew Beekhof" <andrew at beekhof.net>:
>>>>> On 29/08/2013, at 7:31 PM, Andrey Groshev <greenx at yandex.ru> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> 29.08.2013, 12:25, "Andrey Groshev" <greenx at yandex.ru>:
>>>>>>> 29.08.2013, 02:55, "Andrew Beekhof" <andrew at beekhof.net>:
>>>>>>>> On 28/08/2013, at 5:38 PM, Andrey Groshev <greenx at yandex.ru> wrote:
>>>>>>>>> 28.08.2013, 04:06, "Andrew Beekhof" <andrew at beekhof.net>:
>>>>>>>>>> On 27/08/2013, at 1:13 PM, Andrey Groshev <greenx at yandex.ru> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> 27.08.2013, 05:39, "Andrew Beekhof" <andrew at beekhof.net>:
>>>>>>>>>>>> On 26/08/2013, at 3:09 PM, Andrey Groshev <greenx at yandex.ru> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 26.08.2013, 03:34, "Andrew Beekhof" <andrew at beekhof.net>:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 23/08/2013, at 9:39 PM, Andrey Groshev <greenx at yandex.ru> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hello,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Today I try remake my test cluster from cman to corosync2.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I drew attention to the following:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> If I reset cluster with cman through cibadmin --erase --force
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In cib is still there exist names of nodes.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Yes, the cluster puts back entries for all the nodes it know about automagically.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> cibadmin -Ql
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> .....
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <nodes>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <node id="dev-cluster2-node2.unix.tensor.ru" uname="dev-cluster2-node2"/>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <node id="dev-cluster2-node4.unix.tensor.ru" uname="dev-cluster2-node4"/>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <node id="dev-cluster2-node3.unix.tensor.ru" uname="dev-cluster2-node3"/>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> </nodes>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ....
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Even if cman and pacemaker running only one node.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I'm assuming all three are configured in cluster.conf?
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Yes, there exist list nodes.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> And if I do too on cluster with corosync2
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I see only names of nodes which run corosync and pacemaker.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Since you're not included your config, I can only guess that your corosync.conf does not have a nodelist.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> If it did, you should get the same behaviour.
>>>>>>>>>>>>> I try and expected_node and nodelist.
>>>>>>>>>>>> And it didn't work? What version of pacemaker?
>>>>>>>>>>> It does not work as I expected.
>>>>>>>>>> Thats because you've used IP addresses in the node list.
>>>>>>>>>> ie.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> node {
>>>>>>>>>> ring0_addr: 10.76.157.17
>>>>>>>>>> }
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> try including the node name as well, eg.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> node {
>>>>>>>>>> name: dev-cluster2-node2
>>>>>>>>>> ring0_addr: 10.76.157.17
>>>>>>>>>> }
>>>>>>>>> The same thing.
>>>>>>>> I don't know what to say. I tested it here yesterday and it worked as expected.
>>>>>>> I found that the reason that You and I have different results - I did not have reverse DNS zone for these nodes.
>>>>>>> I know what it should be, but (PACEMAKER + CMAN) worked without a reverse area!
>>>>>> Hasty. Deleted all. Reinstalled. Configured. Not working again. Damn!
>>>>>
>>>>> It would have surprised me... pacemaker 1.1.11 doesn't do any dns lookups - reverse or otherwise.
>>>>> Can you set
>>>>>
>>>>> PCMK_trace_files=corosync.c
>>>>>
>>>>> in your environment and retest?
>>>>>
>>>>> On RHEL6 that means putting the following in /etc/sysconfig/pacemaker
>>>>> export PCMK_trace_files=corosync.c
>>>>>
>>>>> It should produce additional logging[1] that will help diagnose the issue.
>>>>>
>>>>> [1] http://blog.clusterlabs.org/blog/2013/pacemaker-logging/
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Hello, Andrew.
>>>>
>>>> You are a little misunderstood me.
>>>
>>> No, I understood you fine.
>>>
>>>> I wrote that I rushed to judgment.
>>>> After I did the reverse DNS zone, the cluster behaved correctly.
>>>> BUT after I took apart the cluster dropped configs and restarted on the new cluster,
>>>> cluster again don't showed all the nodes in the nodes (only node with running pacemaker).
>>>>
>>>> A small portion of the log. Full log
>>>> In which (I thought) there is something interesting.
>>>>
>>>> Aug 30 12:31:11 [9986] dev-cluster2-node4 cib: ( corosync.c:423 ) trace: check_message_sanity: Verfied message 4: (dest=<all>:cib, from=dev-cluster2-node4:cib.9986, compressed=0, size=1551, total=2143)
>>>> Aug 30 12:31:11 [9989] dev-cluster2-node4 attrd: ( corosync.c:96 ) trace: corosync_node_name: Checking 172793107 vs 0 from nodelist.node.0.nodeid
>>>> Aug 30 12:31:11 [9989] dev-cluster2-node4 attrd: ( ipcc.c:378 ) debug: qb_ipcc_disconnect: qb_ipcc_disconnect()
>>>> Aug 30 12:31:11 [9989] dev-cluster2-node4 attrd: (ringbuffer.c:294 ) debug: qb_rb_close: Closing ringbuffer: /dev/shm/qb-cmap-request-9616-9989-27-header
>>>> Aug 30 12:31:11 [9989] dev-cluster2-node4 attrd: (ringbuffer.c:294 ) debug: qb_rb_close: Closing ringbuffer: /dev/shm/qb-cmap-response-9616-9989-27-header
>>>> Aug 30 12:31:11 [9989] dev-cluster2-node4 attrd: (ringbuffer.c:294 ) debug: qb_rb_close: Closing ringbuffer: /dev/shm/qb-cmap-event-9616-9989-27-header
>>>> Aug 30 12:31:11 [9989] dev-cluster2-node4 attrd: ( corosync.c:134 ) notice: corosync_node_name: Unable to get node name for nodeid 172793107
>>>
>>> I wonder if you need to be including the nodeid too. ie.
>>>
>>> node {
>>> name: dev-cluster2-node2
>>> ring0_addr: 10.76.157.17
>>> nodeid: 2
>>> }
>>>
>>> I _thought_ that was implicit.
>>> Chrissie: is "nodelist.node.%d.nodeid" always available for corosync2 or only if explicitly defined in the config?
>>>
>>
>>
>> You do need to specify a nodeid if you don't want corosync to imply it from the IP address (or you're using IPv6). corosync won't imply a nodeif from the order of the nodes in corosync.conf - that's not reliable enough.
>
> Right, but is that implied nodeid available as "nodelist.node.%d.nodeid"?
> Andrey's results suggest "no" and I would claim this is not expected/good :)
>
If you want to get the nodeid of the node you are on there is both a
corosync API call for it - totem_nodeid_get() - or you can get it from
votequorum via cmap - runtime.votequorum.this_node_id
The nodelist.* section of cmap is really meant to reflect what is in
corosync.conf and I don't really want to be writing into it. I know
there is already nodelist.our_node_pos, but I'm not a fan of that either :P
Chrissie
>> Also bear in mind that 0 is not a valid node number :-)
>>
>> Chrissie
>>
>
More information about the Pacemaker
mailing list