[Pacemaker] Problems with Pacemaker 1.1.8 on F17

Lars Kellogg-Stedman lars at oddbit.com
Thu Feb 21 22:21:13 EST 2013


The "switch" is a standard Linux bridge device, and the two systems are KVM
virtual machines attached to the same bridge.  Are there known problems
with this configuration?  I' can't get corosync to stay up for more than a
few minutes.  I would simply use a vrrp or carp solution, but I need a
service to follow the vip and there aren't many alternatives out there.

I'll see if using udpu stabilizes things.


On Thu, Feb 21, 2013 at 10:16 PM, Andrew Beekhof <andrew at beekhof.net> wrote:

> On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 1:00 PM, Lars Kellogg-Stedman <lars at oddbit.com>
> wrote:
> >
> >> Did you define a recurring monitor action?
> >>
> >
> > You know, upon reflection, probably not.  I started with "op monitor
> > interval=10s", but because of all the problems I ran into with pcs
> > complaining about systemd: services I think I dropped everything except
> the
> > service name and agent in order to simplify the problem. I'll try it
> again
> > with an explicit monitor action.
> >
> >>
> >> What does corosync.conf look like?
> >
> >
> > Like this: https://gist.github.com/larsks/5010169
> >
> > This was generated using the "pcs corosync configure puppet puppet0
> > puppet1".
> >
>
> Perhaps enable udpu (unicast) there.  Corosync doesn't seem to like your
> switch.
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.clusterlabs.org/pipermail/pacemaker/attachments/20130221/286ed227/attachment-0007.html>


More information about the Pacemaker mailing list