[Pacemaker] Fwd: Re: How can I make the secondary machine elect itself owner of the floating IP address?

Andrew Beekhof andrew at beekhof.net
Mon Sep 24 05:26:18 EDT 2012


FYI, in 1.1.8 you can also do:
   stonith_admin --confirm nodename

to mark the node as cleanly down (no agent needed), instead of using
the meatware stuff

On Mon, Sep 24, 2012 at 3:22 PM, Tim Serong <tserong at suse.com> wrote:
> Forwarding to the list for posterity (i.e. google) - I believe my reply
> did solve the problem, BTW.
>
> The crm config in question is:
>
> node scc-bak
> node scc-pri
> primitive ClusterIP ocf:heartbeat:IPaddr2 \
>         params ip="10.1.1.180" cidr_netmask="24" \
>         op monitor interval="30s"
> primitive drbd_r0 ocf:linbit:drbd \
>         params drbd_resource="r0" \
>         op monitor interval="15" role="Master" \
>         op monitor interval="30" role="Slave" \
> primitive fs_r0 ocf:heartbeat:Filesystem \
>         params device="/dev/drbd1" directory="/home/scc" fstype="ext3" \
>         op monitor interval="10s"
> primitive scc-stonith stonith:meatware \
>         operations $id="scc-stonith-operations" \
>         op monitor interval="3600" timeout="20" start-delay="15" \
>         params hostlist="10.1.1.32 10.1.1.31"
> group r0 fs_R0 ClusterIP
> ms ms_drbd_r0 drbd_ro \
>         meta master-max="1" master-node-max="1" clone-max="2" \
>         clone-node-max="1" notify="true"
> colocation r0_on_drbd inf: r0 ms_drbd_r0:Master
> order r0_after_drbd inf: ms_drbd_r0:promote r0:start
> property $id="cib-bootstrap-options" \
>         dc-version="1.1.6-b988976485d15cb702c9307df55512d323831a5e" \
>         cluster-infrastructure="openais" \
>         expected-quorum-votes="2" \
>         no-quorum-policy="ignore"
> rsc_defaults $id="rsc-options" \
>         resource-stickiness="200"
>
> I probably should have noted that "scc-pri" and "scc-bak" aren't really
> the best choice of names, because "pri" and "bak" are kind of
> meaningless assuming identical nodes (and the nomenclature gets
> confusing when you start talking about masters and slaves on top of that).
>
> Anyway...
>
> -------- Original Message --------
> Subject: Re: How can I make the secondary machine elect itself owner of
> the floating IP address?
> Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2012 12:36:03 +1000
> From: Tim Serong
> To: Epps, Josh
>
> Hi Josh,
>
> On 09/20/2012 10:47 AM, Epps, Josh wrote:
>> Hi Tim,
>>
>> I saw one of your Gossamer threads and I really need some help.
>>
>> I have a two-node cluster running on SLES 11 SP2 with Pacemaker and DRBD.
>> When I shutdown the primary with the "shutdown -h now"  the
>> ocf:heartbeat:IPaddr2 transfers nicely to the backup server.
>> But when I simulate a failure on the primary node by killing the power
>> neither the floating IP address or the mount transfer to the secondary
>> machine.
>
> What's probably happening is:
>
> - When you do a clean shutdown of one node, the surviving node knows the
> first has gone away, and it can safely take over those resources.
> - When you cut power, the surviving node doesn't know what state the
> first node is in, so will do nothing until the first node is fenced.
> - You're using the meatware STONITH plugin (which probably doesn't need
> a monitor op, BTW), which means you should see a CRIT message in syslog
> on the surviving node, telling you it expects the first node to be fenced.
>
>>
>> How can I make the secondary machine elect itself owner of the floating
>> IP address?
>
> Assuming the first machine is really down :) you should be able to tell
> the cluster this is so by running "meatclient -c scc-pri" on the
> surviving node (but do check syslog to see if you're really getting
> warnings about a node needing to be fenced).
>
>> Suse support today said that it can’t be done with just two nodes but we
>> just require a one-way failover.
>
> Two node clusters should work fine, they're just more annoying than
> three node - see for example "STONITH Deathmatch Explained" at
> http://ourobengr.com/ha/
>
> If the above doesn't solve it for you, do you mind if we take this to
> the linux-ha or pacemaker public mailing list?  More eyes on a problem
> never hurts, and then a solution becomes googlable :)
>
> Regards,
>
> Tim
> --
> Tim Serong
> Senior Clustering Engineer
> SUSE
> tserong at suse.com
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Pacemaker mailing list: Pacemaker at oss.clusterlabs.org
> http://oss.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/pacemaker
>
> Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org
> Getting started: http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf
> Bugs: http://bugs.clusterlabs.org




More information about the Pacemaker mailing list