[Pacemaker] How to make a redundant structure of arbitrator?

[Yuichi SEINO]

Hi Jiaju,

Thank you for a reply. I understand the case that a arbitrator have to
be redundant .
And I want to ask two questions .

1. I think about a satisfied way. Its way is that we make a special
site of arbitrator.
    Can this way satisfy?
    For example, if a running arbitrator node is stop,  this node is
fail-over to a other node.

2. In the case " for example, you have 2 sites, and configure 3 arbitrators",
    if 1 arbitrators stop, the structure is 2 site and 2 arbitrators.
    In this case, because the number of instance is an even number,
    i think that the arbitrator can't stop anymore.
    Am I correct　think?

Sincerely,
Jiaju


2012年3月27日11:33 Andrew Beekhof <andrew at beekhof.net>:
> On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 2:34 AM, Jiaju Zhang <jjzhang at suse.de> wrote:
>> On Mon, 2012-03-26 at 11:50 +0900, Yuichi Seino wrote:
>>> Hi Jiaju,
>>>
>>> I have a question about booth.
>>> I would like to know if a redundant structure of arbitrator is possible.
>>> If it is possible, Please tell me how to the approach.
>>
>> If I understand the question correctly, you mean that the arbitrator
>> should be redundant in case it might be down. Well, this can be resolved
>> by adding more arbitrators, for example, you have 2 sites, and configure
>> 3 arbitrators.
>
> The arbitrator is already redundant isn't it?
> Because you need a cluster node to fail before an arbitrator failure
> has any ill-effect.
>
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Jiaju
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Pacemaker mailing list: Pacemaker at oss.clusterlabs.org
>> http://oss.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/pacemaker
>>
>> Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org
>> Getting started: http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf
>> Bugs: http://bugs.clusterlabs.org



-- 
Yuichi Seino
METROSYSTEMS CORPORATION
E-mail:seino.cluster2 at gmail.com