[Pacemaker] No resource failback with no stickiness - why ?

[Sébastien ROHAUT]

Ok, I understand. Thank you for your explanation.

Le 20/02/2012 15:05, Andreas Kurz a écrit :
> Hello,
>
> On 02/18/2012 03:15 PM, Sébastien ROHAUT wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I'm using Pacemaker 1.1.6 and corosync 1.4.2 under Fedora Core 16, using
>> default rpms from repositories.
>>
>> I'm trying to get a working Pacemaker cluster and I'm testing it by
>> creating the "cluster from cratch configuration" from
>> http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf.
>> <http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf>
>>
>> I already worked with pacemaker 1.0.x two years ago, and it worked well
>> (with the older documentation).
>>
>> I'm encountering a problem. I added my IPAddr resource and tried
>> failvover/failback. So I stop my first node, and my resource moves to
>> node2. After a minute I restart node1, but my resource doesn't come
>> back, my resource stays on node2.
> Without any constraints the cluster is free to move/locate resources
> wherever it likes ... base policy is to balance all resources evenly
> over available nodes ... you only have one resource -- cluster decides
> to leave it as it is.
>
>> As explained page 49, my resource should go back to node1. I didn't
>> apply any stickiness value to my resource or in rsc_default. Did the
>> behavior changed in this release ?
>>
>> How to make it working ?
> Define a location constraint, preferring node1.
>
> Regards,
> Andreas
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Pacemaker mailing list: Pacemaker at oss.clusterlabs.org
> http://oss.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/pacemaker
>
> Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org
> Getting started: http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf
> Bugs: http://bugs.clusterlabs.org

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.clusterlabs.org/pipermail/pacemaker/attachments/20120220/4f04f76f/attachment-0003.html>