[Pacemaker] Corosync vs Heartbeat

Andrew Beekhof andrew at beekhof.net
Thu Apr 26 21:48:32 EDT 2012


On Thu, Apr 26, 2012 at 7:56 PM, S, MOHAMED (MOHAMED)** CTR **
<mohamed.s at alcatel-lucent.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> If I want to try Pacemaker 1.1.7 and Corosync 2.0 in RHEL 5.0,
>
> Where can I find the set of rpms?

You'd have to build them yourself.
And submit a patch to get it to build there at all I think (because
glib is so old).

Why not use something a little more recent?

> I could not find it in the following location
> http://www.clusterlabs.org/rpm-next/epel-5/x86_64/
>
> Thanks,
> Raffi
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: S, MOHAMED (MOHAMED)** CTR **
>> Sent: Saturday, April 14, 2012 1:16 PM
>> To: 'Digimer'; The Pacemaker cluster resource manager
>> Subject: RE: [Pacemaker] Corosync vs Heartbeat
>>
>> Digimer,
>>
>> Thanks for your advise.
>>
>> Regards,
>> Raffi
>>
>>
>> > -----Original Message-----
>> > From: Digimer [mailto:lists at alteeve.ca]
>> > Sent: Friday, April 13, 2012 5:32 PM
>> > To: The Pacemaker cluster resource manager
>> > Cc: S, MOHAMED (MOHAMED)** CTR **
>> > Subject: Re: [Pacemaker] Corosync vs Heartbeat
>> >
>> > On 04/13/2012 07:35 AM, S, MOHAMED (MOHAMED)** CTR ** wrote:
>> > > Hi,
>> > >
>> > > Which combination is good for a 2 node Active - Passive configuration?
>> > >
>> > > Pacemaker + Corosync
>> > >
>> > > or
>> > >
>> > > Pacemaker + heartbeat
>> > >
>> > > Thanks,
>> > > Raffi
>> >
>> > Heartbeat is deprecated and no longer developed (though it is maintained
>> > by Linbit). It is strongly advised that you use corosync.
>> >
>> > --
>> > Digimer
>> > Papers and Projects: https://alteeve.com
>
> _______________________________________________
> Pacemaker mailing list: Pacemaker at oss.clusterlabs.org
> http://oss.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/pacemaker
>
> Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org
> Getting started: http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf
> Bugs: http://bugs.clusterlabs.org




More information about the Pacemaker mailing list