[Pacemaker] Quorum contradiction?

[Ciro Iriarte]

2011/6/26 Andrew Beekhof <andrew at beekhof.net>:
> On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 10:40 PM, Ciro Iriarte <cyruspy at gmail.com> wrote:
>> Hi, I'm running my first Corosync based cluster and I'm seeing
>> something odd (maybe I didn't get it right), Pacemaker tells me that
>> two nodes are present, but corosync gives me 0 votos a no nodes, is
>> this expected (corosync delegating functions to pacemaker)?
>>
>> test2:~ # rpm -q pacemaker corosync
>> pacemaker-1.1.5-1.1
>> corosync-1.3.0-1.1
>>
>> test2:~ # crm_mon -1
>> ============
>> Last updated: Wed Jun 22 08:38:33 2011
>> Stack: openais
>> Current DC: test1 - partition with quorum
>> Version: 1.1.5-ecb6baaf7fc091b023d6d4ba7e0fce26d32cf5c8
>> 2 Nodes configured, 2 expected votes
>> 0 Resources configured.
>> ============
>>
>> Online: [ test2 test1 ]
>>
>> test2:~ # corosync-quorumtool -l
>
> Pacemaker is not using the (still yet to be thoroughly integration
> tested) quorum logic in corosync.
> Therefor corosync-quorumtool is not the right tool to be consulting.
> Try crm_node
>
>

Thanks, I'm looking for a way to test just the "basic membership"
part. I thought Corosync would be taking care about cluster membership
and Pacemaker would only deal with resources...

I need to read a little more apparently..

Regards,

-- 
Ciro Iriarte
http://cyruspy.wordpress.com
--