[Pacemaker] The placement strategy of the group resource does not work well

Andrew Beekhof andrew at beekhof.net
Mon Jul 18 21:42:21 EDT 2011


This should now be fixed in:
   http://hg.clusterlabs.org/pacemaker/devel/rev/960a7e3da680

Its based on your patches but is a little more generic.

On Mon, Jul 11, 2011 at 10:22 PM, Yuusuke IIDA
<iidayuus at intellilink.co.jp> wrote:
> Hi, Yan
>
> After trying your correction , I had the following problems.
>
>  * When trouble happened in a resource below the top of group , it did not
> come in fail over in the node that intended.
>
> I attach crm_report when a problem occurred.
>
> I tried a correction again.
>
> The patch which I attached traces it to a lower resource of group and gets
> score.
>
> Is there any problem with this correction?
>
> Regards,
> Yuusuke
>
> (2011/07/07 21:45), Gao,Yan wrote:
>>
>> Hi Yuusuke,
>> Thanks a lot for the report and the patch!
>>
>> I somewhat prefer simplifying the policy, like the attached patch.
>>
>> What do you think about it? Could you please give it a try?
>>
>> Regards,
>>   Yan
>>
>>
>> On 06/30/11 16:36, Yuusuke IIDA wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi, Yan
>>>
>>> I wrote a patch for Pacemaker-dev to solve this problem.
>>>
>>> I want you to confirm the patch.
>>>
>>> I want a repository to merge it if there is not a problem.
>>>
>>> Best Regards,
>>> Yuusuke
>>>
>>> (2011/06/20 16:10), Yuusuke IIDA wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Hi, Yan
>>>>
>>>> I wanted to scatter transition of the group resource, however failed.
>>>>
>>>>   * Initial state
>>>> Online: [act1 sby1 sby2]
>>>> Full list of resources:
>>>>   Resource Group: grp1
>>>>       rsc1       (ocf::pacemaker:Dummy): Started act1
>>>>   Resource Group: grp2
>>>>       rsc2       (ocf::pacemaker:Dummy): Started act1
>>>>   Resource Group: grp3
>>>>       rsc3       (ocf::pacemaker:Dummy): Started act1
>>>>
>>>>   * When I let you break down in order of grp1 ->   grp2 ->   grp3.
>>>> Online: [act1 sby1 sby2]
>>>> Full list of resources:
>>>>   Resource Group: grp1
>>>>       rsc1       (ocf::pacemaker:Dummy): Started sby1
>>>>   Resource Group: grp2
>>>>       rsc2       (ocf::pacemaker:Dummy): Started sby2
>>>>   Resource Group: grp3
>>>>       rsc3       (ocf::pacemaker:Dummy): Started sby1
>>>>
>>>>   * When I let you break down in order of grp3 ->   grp2 ->   grp1.
>>>> (there is a problem)
>>>> Online: [act1 sby1 sby2]
>>>> Full list of resources:
>>>>   Resource Group: grp1
>>>>       rsc1       (ocf::pacemaker:Dummy): Started sby1
>>>>   Resource Group: grp2
>>>>       rsc2       (ocf::pacemaker:Dummy): Started sby1
>>>>   Resource Group: grp3
>>>>       rsc3       (ocf::pacemaker:Dummy): Started sby1
>>>>
>>>> As for this, will not it be right like primitive resource to be
>>>> dispersed
>>>> transition?
>>>>
>>>> I attach hb_report when a problem happened.
>>>>
>>>> Best Regards,
>>>> Yuusuke
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Pacemaker mailing list: Pacemaker at oss.clusterlabs.org
>>>> http://oss.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/pacemaker
>>>>
>>>> Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org
>>>> Getting started: http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf
>>>> Bugs:
>>>> http://developerbugs.linux-foundation.org/enter_bug.cgi?product=Pacemaker
>
> --
> ----------------------------------------
> METRO SYSTEMS CO., LTD
>
> Yuusuke Iida
> Mail: iidayuus at intellilink.co.jp
> ----------------------------------------
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Pacemaker mailing list: Pacemaker at oss.clusterlabs.org
> http://oss.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/pacemaker
>
> Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org
> Getting started: http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf
> Bugs:
> http://developerbugs.linux-foundation.org/enter_bug.cgi?product=Pacemaker
>
>




More information about the Pacemaker mailing list