[Pacemaker] [RPMs] clusterlabs.org and epel-6 ?

[Serge Dubrouski]

Since the questions was asked. Is it possible to update those epel (at leasy
5 but both i386 and x86_64) repos with the latest build (3.9.2) of
resource-agents? The current state is inconsistent. Some repos have 1.0.1
some 1.0.4

On Mon, Jul 11, 2011 at 8:01 PM, Andrew Beekhof <andrew at beekhof.net> wrote:

> On Tue, Jul 12, 2011 at 11:57 AM, Thomas Guthmann
> <tguthmann at iseek.com.au> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On clusterlabs.org, there are 2 repositories epel-5 and epel-6.
>
> How many nano-seconds has centos-6 been out for?
>
> > However the
> > epel-6 repository [1] is empty. Do you guys plan to use it or should we
> > build our own RPMs because it's never going to happen ?
> >
> > I believe, like many, with (finally) Centos 6 out we would like to start
> to
> > upgrade our clusters to if possible corosync 1.3.x and Pacemaker 1.1.x
> >
> > So, can you tell us if el6 RPMs are on the roadmap or not ? And if yes,
> an
> > approx. date when they could be released.
>
> I don't believe there is any need for additional RPMs.  Pacemaker
> should already be in CentOS6
>
> _______________________________________________
> Pacemaker mailing list: Pacemaker at oss.clusterlabs.org
> http://oss.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/pacemaker
>
> Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org
> Getting started: http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf
> Bugs:
> http://developerbugs.linux-foundation.org/enter_bug.cgi?product=Pacemaker
>



-- 
Serge Dubrouski.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.clusterlabs.org/pipermail/pacemaker/attachments/20110711/629500d6/attachment-0003.html>