[Pacemaker] Postgresql streaming replication failover - RA needed

Serge Dubrouski sergeyfd at gmail.com
Mon Dec 12 20:35:07 EST 2011


On Mon, Dec 12, 2011 at 5:32 AM, Takatoshi MATSUO <matsuo.tak at gmail.com>wrote:

> Hello
>
> 2011/12/12 Serge Dubrouski <sergeyfd at gmail.com>:
> >
> >
> > On Thu, Dec 8, 2011 at 10:34 PM, Takatoshi MATSUO <matsuo.tak at gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> Hi Attila
> >>
> >> 2011/12/8 Attila Megyeri <amegyeri at minerva-soft.com>:
> >> > Hi Takatoshi,
> >> >
> >> > One strange thing I noticed and could probably be improved.
> >> > When there is data inconsistency, I have the following node
> properties:
> >> >
> >> > * Node psql2:
> >> >    + default_ping_set                  : 100
> >> >    + master-postgresql:1               : -INFINITY
> >> >    + pgsql-data-status                 : DISCONNECT
> >> >    + pgsql-status                      : HS:alone
> >> > * Node psql1:
> >> >    + default_ping_set                  : 100
> >> >    + master-postgresql:0               : 1000
> >> >    + master-postgresql:1               : -INFINITY
> >> >    + pgsql-data-status                 : LATEST
> >> >    + pgsql-master-baseline             : 58:000000004B000020
> >> >    + pgsql-status                      : PRI
> >> >
> >> > This is fine, and understandable - but I can see this only if I do a
> >> > crm_mon -A.
> >> >
> >> > My problem is, that CRM shows the following:
> >> >
> >> > Master/Slave Set: db-ms-psql [postgresql]
> >> >     Masters: [ psql1 ]
> >> >     Slaves: [ psql2 ]
> >> >
> >> > So if I monitor the system from crm_mon, HAWK or ther tools - I have
> no
> >> > indication at all that the slave is running in an inconsistent mode.
> >> >
> >> > I would expect the RA to stop the psql2 node in such cases, because:
> >> > - It is running, but has non-up-to-date data, therefore noone will use
> >> > it (the slave IP points to the master as well, which is good)
> >> > - In CRM status eveything looks perfect, even though it is NOT perfect
> >> > and admin intervention is required.
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > Shouldn't the disconnected PSQL server be stopped instead?
> >>
> >> hmm..
> >> It's not better to stop PGSQL server.
> >> RA cannot know whether PGSQL is disconnected because of
> >> data-inconsistent or network-down or
> >> starting-up and so on.
> >
> >
> > Why does it matter? If the state is degraded and inconsistent and there
> is
> > no way to fix it from inside of the RA, RA should probably stop it.
>
> In this case, HS's data may be cosistent but Primary dosen't have enough
> wals or
> HS dosen't have enough wal-archives to be replication-mode.
> Unfortunately this RA dosen't calculate the number of wals.
>

Honestly I don't know how to better handle this. Pacemaker doesn't have a
concept of degraded node state.


>
> > Let's say that there is pgpool running in front of the cluster, keeping
> an
> > inconsistent node up would lead to the routing SQL queries to it and
> > possibly getting wrong results.
> >
>
> It dosen't happen in my sample configuration.
> vip-slave is up at master when slave is not "HS:sync".
>

So you have a VIP for each slave node?


>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> How about using dummy RA such as vip-slave?
> >> -------------------------------------------
> >> primitive runningSlaveOK ocf:heartbeat:Dummy
> >> .....(snip)
> >>
> >> location rsc_location-dummy runningSlaveOK \
> >>     rule  200: pgsql-status eq "HS:sync"
> >> -------------------------------------------
>
> >
> > That probably fixes visibility issue. What about notifications on
> DISCONNECT
> > state? How administrator would know that cluster is inconsistent? May be
> the
> > better option in this case would be collocating MailTo resource with
> > "HS:alone"?
>
> Yes, it's good idea if you want to receive notifications.
>
>
> Regards,
> Takatoshi MATSUO
>
> _______________________________________________
> Pacemaker mailing list: Pacemaker at oss.clusterlabs.org
> http://oss.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/pacemaker
>
> Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org
> Getting started: http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/Cluster_from_Scratch.pdf
> Bugs: http://bugs.clusterlabs.org
>



-- 
Serge Dubrouski.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.clusterlabs.org/pipermail/pacemaker/attachments/20111212/1b9ba14b/attachment-0003.html>


More information about the Pacemaker mailing list