Apologies. I am using yahoo mail and couldn't find the reply all button. Found it.
--- On Thu, 12/1/11, Patrick H. <pacemaker at feystorm.net> wrote:
From: Patrick H. <pacemaker at feystorm.net>
Subject: Re: [Pacemaker] Fedora 16 Cluster
To: "Charles DeVoe" <scarecrow_57 at yahoo.com>, pacemaker at oss.clusterlabs.org
Date: Thursday, December 1, 2011, 4:55 PM
Yes.
P.S. Dont remove the mailing list from the recipients. Bad etiquette
:-)
Sent: Thu Dec 01 2011 14:50:21 GMT-0700 (MST)
From: Charles DeVoe <scarecrow_57 at yahoo.com>
To: Patrick H. <pacemaker at feystorm.net>
Subject: Re: [Pacemaker] Fedora 16 Cluster
That document says
to remove the pacemaker plugin. Should I start pacemaker
as a service?
--- On Thu, 12/1/11, Patrick H. <pacemaker at feystorm.net>
wrote:
From: Patrick H. <pacemaker at feystorm.net>
Subject: Re: [Pacemaker] Fedora 16 Cluster
To: "Charles DeVoe" <scarecrow_57 at yahoo.com>,
pacemaker at oss.clusterlabs.org
Date: Thursday, December 1, 2011, 4:22 PM
Yes, the original documentation you came across
that talks about CMAN :-)
http://www.clusterlabs.org/doc/en-US/Pacemaker/1.1/html/Clusters_from_Scratch/ch08s02.html
Though you dont need the gfs stuff if youre not
going to be using gfs
Sent: Thu Dec 01 2011 14:00:44 GMT-0700 (MST)
From: Charles DeVoe <scarecrow_57 at yahoo.com>
To: Patrick H. <pacemaker at feystorm.net>
Subject: Re: [Pacemaker] Fedora 16 Cluster
Is
there some documentation on how to set up
option 3?
corosync + cpg + cman + mcp
Do I simply start up pacemaker????
Also, what is cpg?
--- On Thu, 12/1/11, Patrick H. <pacemaker at feystorm.net>
wrote:
From: Patrick H. <pacemaker at feystorm.net>
Subject: Re: [Pacemaker] Fedora 16
Cluster
To: "The Pacemaker cluster resource
manager" <pacemaker at oss.clusterlabs.org>
Cc: "Charles DeVoe" <scarecrow_57 at yahoo.com>
Date: Thursday, December 1, 2011, 1:52
PM
Sent: Thu Dec 01 2011 11:34:39
GMT-0700 (MST)
From: Charles DeVoe <scarecrow_57 at yahoo.com>
To: pacemaker at oss.clusterlabs.org
Subject: [Pacemaker] Fedora 16
Cluster
I've spent
the last month or so
building linux clusters.
2 of them in a VM
environment on fedora 15.
I went through the
Clusters from Scratch
Tutorial; which sort of
worked. At this time I am
looking for a sanity
check.
My requirements are to
have a 4 node load
balanced cluster with
shard access to a SAN
volume. The SAN will be
using GFS2.
I believe I need
corosync, Openais,
PaceMaker, and GFS2
utilities.
Where the confusion is
coming from is the use of
CMAN in the clusters from
scratch. It seems from
what I am reading that
Pacemaker should be able
to do everything I need
and I am wondering if the
use of cman is old
information.
Any thoughts comments or
suggestiosn are greatly
appreciated, Thanks in
advance.
No, CMAN is the new information.
Theres a nasty bug out there (see http://www.mail-archive.com/openais@lists.linux-foundation.org/msg05600.html)
if you setup pacemaker 1.1 without
the new MCP stuff. Best solution is
to switch to CMAN. See http://theclusterguy.clusterlabs.org/post/907043024/introducing-the-pacemaker-master-control-process-for
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.clusterlabs.org/pipermail/pacemaker/attachments/20111201/00ff17a9/attachment-0003.html>