[Pacemaker] Project updates

Andrew Beekhof andrew at beekhof.net
Tue Nov 16 03:13:46 EST 2010


On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 8:07 AM, Keisuke MORI <keisuke.mori+ha at gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Andrew,
>
>>> On Fri, Nov 12, 2010 at 9:32 AM, Andrew Beekhof <andrew at beekhof.net> wrote:
>>>> For those that aren't using RSS readers, I wanted to draw people's
>>>> attention to a couple of updates that went out today.
>
> Congratulations for the 1.0.10 release!
> It is the great excitement for us too,
> but one thing I would like to comment...
>
>
> 2010/11/13 Andrew Beekhof <andrew at beekhof.net>:
>> On Fri, Nov 12, 2010 at 5:49 PM, Vadym Chepkov <vchepkov at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>
>>>  STABLE_SERIES          = stable-1.0
>>>
>>>  RPM_ROOT       = $(shell pwd)
>>> diff -r 99f5a1e61667 configure.ac
>>> --- a/configure.ac      Fri Nov 12 09:12:32 2010 +0100
>>> +++ b/configure.ac      Fri Nov 12 11:47:28 2010 -0500
>>> @@ -19,7 +19,7 @@
>>>  dnl     checks for library functions
>>>  dnl     checks for system services
>>>
>>> -AC_INIT(pacemaker, 1.0.9, pacemaker at oss.clusterlabs.org)
>>> +AC_INIT(pacemaker, 1.0.10, pacemaker at oss.clusterlabs.org)
>>
>> thats kinda annoying but not crucial.  thanks for pointing it out
>>
>
> This would be confusing for users to tell which version they're
> actually using when they are going to report a problem because all the
> logs and crm_mon output shows the version as "1.0.9".
>
> Any chance of the release for another RPMs with this fix?

Oh, I forgot about crm_mon.
I'll see what I can do.




More information about the Pacemaker mailing list