[Pacemaker] unexpected quorum votes in new debian packages

Andrew Beekhof andrew at beekhof.net
Fri Feb 5 06:19:06 EST 2010


On Fri, Feb 5, 2010 at 12:13 PM, Michael Schwartzkopff
<misch at multinet.de> wrote:
> Am Freitag, 5. Februar 2010 12:03:44 schrieb Andrew Beekhof:
>
>> Nothing there looks even remotely relevant.
>> Its also highly unlikely that I managed to make a change that
>> resurrected the exact same symptom from 1.0.5 (which I also did
>> nothing to actually fix - except add logging thats not been triggered
>> here).
>
> Fully agree. I cannot explain myself. Perhaps a new bug?
>
>> What does the cluster do if you manually set a value for
>> expected-quorum-votes? Does the value stay set in the CIB or get
>> erased?
>
> the value stays in the CIB but is not evaluated for the quorum descision.

shouldn't matter.
as i said, the corosync plugin already had the right value.

>
>> I can't imagine that its influencing quorum either.
>> This is the only line indicating a value change, and its set to the
>> correct value:
>>
>>   Feb  4 21:22:22 debian2 corosync[6221]:   [pcmk  ] info:
>> update_expected_votes: Expected quorum votes 1024 -> 2
>>
>> Strange
>
> Very strange, indeed.
>
> --
> Dr. Michael Schwartzkopff
> MultiNET Services GmbH
> Addresse: Bretonischer Ring 7; 85630 Grasbrunn; Germany
> Tel: +49 - 89 - 45 69 11 0
> Fax: +49 - 89 - 45 69 11 21
> mob: +49 - 174 - 343 28 75
>
> mail: misch at multinet.de
> web: www.multinet.de
>
> Sitz der Gesellschaft: 85630 Grasbrunn
> Registergericht: Amtsgericht München HRB 114375
> Geschäftsführer: Günter Jurgeneit, Hubert Martens
>
> ---
>
> PGP Fingerprint: F919 3919 FF12 ED5A 2801 DEA6 AA77 57A4 EDD8 979B
> Skype: misch42
>
> _______________________________________________
> Pacemaker mailing list
> Pacemaker at oss.clusterlabs.org
> http://oss.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/pacemaker
>




More information about the Pacemaker mailing list